Smart ForTwo 2010 vs Smart ForTwo 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Smart ForTwo 2010 is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Smart ForTwo 2004 is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 0.8 - 1.0 | 0.6 - 0.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 - 102 HP | 41 - 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 89 - 147 NM | 80 - 110 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 16.8 seconds | 12.3 - 19.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 5.2 | 3.4 - 5.3 | |
|
Smart ForTwo 2010 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Smart ForTwo 2004. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 2.70 m | 2.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.56 m | 1.52 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Smart ForTwo 2010 is larger, but slightly lower. Smart ForTwo 2010 is 20 cm longer than the Smart ForTwo 2004, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 8.8 meters | 8.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Smart ForTwo 2010 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Smart ForTwo 2004. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`039 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Smart ForTwo has
|
Smart ForTwo has
| |