Smart ForTwo 2012 vs Volvo V40 2016

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Smart ForTwo
2012 -
Volvo V40
2016 -
Body: CoupeHatchback
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Smart ForTwo is available with rear wheel drive, while Volvo V40 can be equipped with front wheel drive.
Engines: 0.8 - 1.01.5 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 54 - 102 HP120 - 245 HP
Torque: 89 - 147 NM220 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.9 - 16.8 seconds6.3 - 10.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.2 - 5.23.4 - 5.9
Smart ForTwo petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 2.70 m4.37 m
Width: 1.56 m1.80 m
Height: 1.56 m1.44 m
Smart ForTwo is smaller, but higher.
Smart ForTwo is 167 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 24 cm narrower, while the height of Smart ForTwo is 12 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 220 litres335 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1500 litres
Volvo V40 has more luggage space.
Smart ForTwo has 115 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40.
Turning diameter: 8.8 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Smart ForTwo is 2 metres less than that of the Volvo V40, which means Smart ForTwo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`035~ 1`978
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 760011 800
Pros and Cons: Smart ForTwo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Volvo V40 has
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv