Smart ForTwo 2012 vs Toyota Aygo 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Smart ForTwo is available with rear wheel drive, while Toyota Aygo can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 0.8 - 1.0 (petrol, diesel, electric) | 1.0 - 1.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Smart ForTwo is available also with electric engines. Electric engines provide instant torque and produce zero tailpipe emissions compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 - 102 HP | 55 - 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 89 - 147 NM | 93 - 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 16.8 seconds | 14.2 - 16.8 seconds | |
| In general, Smart ForTwo are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Toyota Aygo. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.3 - 5.2 | 3.8 - 4.2 | |
|
Smart ForTwo petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Aygo. On average, Smart ForTwo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 2.70 m | 3.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.56 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Smart ForTwo is smaller, but higher. Smart ForTwo is 72 cm shorter than the Toyota Aygo, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Smart ForTwo is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
340 litres | 751 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Smart ForTwo has 81 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. The Toyota Aygo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Aygo (by 411 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 8.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Smart ForTwo is 0.6 metres less than that of the Toyota Aygo, which means Smart ForTwo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`064 | ~ 1`188 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Smart ForTwo has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |