Smart ForTwo 2012 vs Chevrolet Matiz 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
| Smart ForTwo is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Chevrolet Matiz is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Smart ForTwo is available with rear wheel drive, while Chevrolet Matiz can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 0.8 - 1.0 (petrol, diesel) | 0.8 - 1.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 - 102 HP | 51 - 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 89 - 147 NM | 69 - 87 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 16.8 seconds | 15.3 - 17 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 5.2 | 6.1 - 6.4 | |
|
Smart ForTwo petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Matiz. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 2.70 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.56 m | 1.50 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.48 m | |
| Smart ForTwo is 81 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Matiz, 6 cm wider, while the height of Smart ForTwo is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 8.8 meters | 9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Smart ForTwo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Matiz. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`035 | ~ 773 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Smart ForTwo has
|
Chevrolet Matiz has
| |