Skoda Fabia 2015 vs Volkswagen Polo 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia engine produces 15 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.5 | 3.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.5 l/100km | 4.9 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1280 km in combined cycle | 1320 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is larger. Skoda Fabia is 2 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 5 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 952 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Skoda Fabia has 50 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 198 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`620 | 1`670 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |