Skoda Fabia 2015 vs Skoda Rapid 2015
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 230 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia engine produces 15 HP more power than Skoda Rapid, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Skoda Rapid. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.5 | 3.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.5 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km | |
The Skoda Rapid is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1280 km in combined cycle | 1520 km in combined cycle | |
1360 km on highway | 1610 km on highway | ||
810 km with real consumption | 1100 km with real consumption | ||
Skoda Rapid gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.99 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
Skoda Fabia is 49 cm shorter than the Skoda Rapid, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 550 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 1490 litres | |
Skoda Rapid has more luggage space. Skoda Fabia has 220 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Rapid. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Rapid (by 340 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Rapid, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`620 | 1`694 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | average | |
Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Rapid, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 7600 | 6200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |