Skoda Fabia 2015 vs Skoda Rapid 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Skoda Fabia and Skoda Rapid have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | 3.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 1440 km in combined cycle | |
| 1320 km on highway | 1520 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Rapid gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 49 cm shorter than the Skoda Rapid, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 1490 litres | |
|
Skoda Rapid has more luggage space. Skoda Fabia has 220 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Rapid. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Rapid (by 340 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Rapid, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`641 | 1`715 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Rapid, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |