Skoda Fabia 2015 vs Mazda 2 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia engine produces 20 HP more power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Mazda 2. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.50 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Fabia is 7 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 4 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 950 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Fabia has 50 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The Mazda 2 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 200 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 1 metres more than that of the Mazda 2, which means Skoda Fabia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`609 | 1`535 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |