Skoda Fabia 2015 vs Volkswagen Polo 2014
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 95 NM | 95 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.7 seconds | 14.3 seconds | |
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 15 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
1090 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
760 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.99 m | 3.97 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
Skoda Fabia is larger. Skoda Fabia is 2 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 5 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 280 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 952 litres | |
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Skoda Fabia has 50 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 198 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | 1`570 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 7600 | 5800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |