Skoda Fabia 2015 vs Nissan Micra 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 0.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 140 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.7 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Nissan Micra is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 30 HP less power than Nissan Micra, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Nissan Micra. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Fabia and Nissan Micra are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 1004 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Skoda Fabia has 30 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Micra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 146 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | 1`530 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |