Skoda Fabia 2015 vs Citroen C3 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.7 seconds | 15.1 seconds | |
|
Citroen C3 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 15 HP less power than Citroen C3, whereas torque is 138 NM less than Citroen C3. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 3.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 4.2 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 1310 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Fabia and Citroen C3 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 922 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Skoda Fabia has 30 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 228 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.4 metres less than that of the Citroen C3, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | 1`620 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Citroen C3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Citroen C3, so Citroen C3 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Citroen C3 has
| |