Skoda Fabia 2010 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia engine produces 95 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 118 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.49 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 3 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
| Skoda Fabia has 20 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`718 | 1`580 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Polo is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |