Skoda Fabia 2010 vs Kia RIO 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 97 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia engine produces 8 HP more power than Kia RIO. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Skoda Fabia 2010 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifetime is relatively short. Vibration at idling speed tends to be excessive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.47 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 1 cm longer than the Kia RIO, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`585 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia RIO has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
| |