Skoda Fabia 2010 vs Hyundai i20 2012
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 HP | 85 HP | |
Torque: | 175 NM | 121 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia engine produces 20 HP more power than Hyundai i20, whereas torque is 54 NM more than Hyundai i20. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
The Hyundai i20 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i20, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i20. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
1000 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
690 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Hyundai i20 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 390'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai i20 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 17 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 14 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Altea, Skoda Yeti | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia RIO, Kia Picanto, Hyundai i10 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Skoda Fabia 2010 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifetime is relatively short. Vibration at idling speed tends to be excessive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.00 m | 4.00 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.49 m | |
Skoda Fabia and Hyundai i20 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 295 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1060 litres | |
Skoda Fabia has 5 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai i20. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.4 metres less than that of the Hyundai i20, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`585 | 1`515 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | low | |
Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai i20 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 3200 | 4200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Hyundai i20 has
| |