Skoda Fabia 2010 vs Hyundai i20 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.1 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 16 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia engine produces 30 HP more power than Hyundai i20, but torque is 5 NM less than Hyundai i20. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 5.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 3.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 4.8 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai i20 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i20, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 315 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i20. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1560 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1660 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 1040 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai i20 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 14 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Altea, Skoda Yeti | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Skoda Fabia engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Skoda Fabia 2010 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifetime is relatively short. Vibration at idling speed tends to be excessive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Fabia is 4 cm shorter than the Hyundai i20, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 326 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1042 litres | |
|
Hyundai i20 has more luggage space. Skoda Fabia has 26 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai i20. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai i20. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`585 | 1`680 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Fabia is better rated in child safety tests. The Skoda Fabia scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Hyundai i20 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Fabia, so Hyundai i20 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Hyundai i20 has
| |