Skoda Fabia 2010 vs Honda Jazz 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 123 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia engine produces 3 HP more power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 52 NM more than Honda Jazz. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Jazz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 14 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Altea, Skoda Yeti | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Skoda Fabia engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Skoda Fabia 2010 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifetime is relatively short. Vibration at idling speed tends to be excessive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.55 m | |
| Skoda Fabia and Honda Jazz are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1314 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Skoda Fabia has 54 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`585 kg | 1`605 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`130 kg | 1`164 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 455 kg | 441 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Honda Jazz scores higher in safety tests. The Honda Jazz scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Jazz has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |