Skoda Fabia 2010 vs Volkswagen Golf 2012

 
Skoda Fabia
2010 - 2015
Volkswagen Golf
2012 - 2017
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 60 HP85 HP
Torque: 108 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.5 seconds11.9 seconds
Volkswagen Golf is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Fabia engine produces 25 HP less power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 52 NM less than Volkswagen Golf. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.54.9
Real fuel consumption: 6.4 l/100km6.0 l/100km
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 90 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 810 km in combined cycle1020 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway1190 km on highway
700 km with real consumption830 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.00 m4.26 m
Width: 1.64 m1.80 m
Height: 1.50 m1.45 m
Skoda Fabia is smaller, but higher.
Skoda Fabia is 26 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 300 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1270 litres
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage space.
Skoda Fabia has 80 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf.
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5551`720
Safety:
Volkswagen Golf scores higher in safety tests.
Quality:
above average

above average
Skoda Fabia has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Golf has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably better
Average price (€): 36008200
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volkswagen Golf has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv