Skoda Fabia 2007 vs Renault Clio 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 HP | 65 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.8 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia engine produces 4 HP more power than Renault Clio, but torque is 5 NM less than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Fabia can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Skoda Fabia version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.42 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 18 cm longer than the Renault Clio, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Fabia is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1163 litres | 1035 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Skoda Fabia has 45 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 128 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 6.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Renault Clio has
| |