Skoda Fabia 2007 vs Mazda 2 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 132 NM | 121 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia engine produces 10 HP more power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Mazda 2. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 2 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 2 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Mazda 2 2007 1.3 engine: The engine is generally robust, but the use of poor-quality fuel can lead to increased burn formation. Idling speeds tend to be unstable. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 9 cm longer than the Mazda 2, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1163 litres | 787 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Skoda Fabia has 50 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 376 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`575 | 1`480 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 2, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |