Skoda Fabia 2004 vs Volkswagen Polo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia engine produces 30 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Fabia is 8 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Fabia is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1015 litres | 1030 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`720 kg | 1`650 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`245 kg | 1`095 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 475 kg | 555 kg | |
| Skoda Fabia load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem less than Volkswagen Polo. Therefore, Volkswagen Polo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |