Skoda Fabia 2004 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia engine produces 26 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Fabia is 6 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Fabia is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 975 litres | |
| Skoda Fabia has 15 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Polo, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |