Skoda Fabia 2004 vs Seat Ibiza 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 17 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia engine produces 37 HP more power than Seat Ibiza, whereas torque is 115 NM more than Seat Ibiza. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 5.5 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 1 cm longer than the Seat Ibiza, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1030 litres | |
| Skoda Fabia has 5 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ibiza. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.1 metres less than that of the Seat Ibiza. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`620 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Ibiza, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |