Skoda Fabia 2004 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Skoda Fabia engine produces 6 HP more power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Despite the higher power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 5.5 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.52 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 15 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 400 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Skoda Fabia has 40 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |