Skoda Fabia 2004 vs Volkswagen Polo 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 64 HP | 100 HP | |
Torque: | 125 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.9 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 36 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 115 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 7.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 4.9 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
1120 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
910 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.96 m | 3.92 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Fabia is 4 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Fabia is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 270 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1015 litres | 1030 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Skoda Fabia has 10 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. This could mean that the Skoda Fabia uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 15 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`650 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Polo, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 2200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 8.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |