Skoda Fabia 2004 vs Volkswagen Polo 2005

 
Skoda Fabia
2004 - 2005
Volkswagen Polo
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 64 HP100 HP
Torque: 125 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 17.9 seconds10.7 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Fabia engine produces 36 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 115 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 7.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.84.9
Real fuel consumption: 4.9 l/100km5.4 l/100km
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 930 km in combined cycle910 km in combined cycle
1120 km on highway1150 km on highway
910 km with real consumption830 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.96 m3.92 m
Width: 1.65 m1.65 m
Height: 1.45 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Fabia is 4 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Fabia is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 260 litres270 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1015 litres1030 litres
Despite its longer length, Skoda Fabia has 10 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. This could mean that the Skoda Fabia uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 15 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`650
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

below average
Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Polo, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 16002400
Rating in user reviews: 7.7/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Volkswagen Polo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv