Skoda Fabia 2004 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 126 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Skoda Fabia engine produces 5 HP more power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 1 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Despite the higher power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.52 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 15 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1015 litres | 400 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Skoda Fabia has 40 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 615 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`435 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | no data | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |