Skoda Fabia 2004 vs Renault Clio 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 106 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.4 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 6 HP less power than Renault Clio, but torque is 13 NM more than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is larger. Skoda Fabia is 15 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 1 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1015 litres | 1035 litres | |
| Skoda Fabia has 5 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 20 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Renault Clio has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Fabia, so Renault Clio quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 6.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Renault Clio has
| |