Skoda Fabia 2004 vs Seat Ibiza 2006

 
Skoda Fabia
2004 - 2007
Seat Ibiza
2006 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 65 HP75 HP
Torque: 112 NM126 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.9 seconds13.2 seconds
Seat Ibiza is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Fabia engine produces 10 HP less power than Seat Ibiza, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Seat Ibiza. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.96.5
Real fuel consumption: 6.5 l/100km6.9 l/100km
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle690 km in combined cycle
690 km with real consumption650 km with real consumption
Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.96 m3.95 m
Width: 1.65 m1.70 m
Height: 1.45 m1.44 m
Skoda Fabia is 1 cm longer than the Seat Ibiza, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 260 litres267 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1015 litresno data
Despite its longer length, Skoda Fabia has 7 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ibiza. This could mean that the Skoda Fabia uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.1 metres less than that of the Seat Ibiza.
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`575no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

low
Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Ibiza, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 16001800
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Seat Ibiza has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • electric power steering
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv