Skoda Fabia 2004 vs Seat Ibiza 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 65 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 112 NM | 126 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.9 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
Seat Ibiza is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 10 HP less power than Seat Ibiza, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Seat Ibiza. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
690 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.96 m | 3.95 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
Skoda Fabia is 1 cm longer than the Seat Ibiza, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 267 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1015 litres | no data | |
Despite its longer length, Skoda Fabia has 7 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ibiza. This could mean that the Skoda Fabia uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.1 metres less than that of the Seat Ibiza. | |||
Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`575 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | low | |
Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Ibiza, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |