Skoda Fabia 2004 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 HP | 84 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 NM | 114 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.9 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 19 HP less power than Chevrolet Aveo, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Chevrolet Aveo. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.51 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 4 cm longer than the Chevrolet Aveo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1015 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Skoda Fabia has 40 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.5 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Aveo, which means Skoda Fabia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`575 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Chevrolet Aveo, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |