Skoda Fabia 2001 vs Peugeot 206 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
| Skoda Fabia engine produces 5 HP more power than Peugeot 206, whereas torque is 23 NM more than Peugeot 206. Despite the higher power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Peugeot 206 2002 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 206 2002 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.43 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 14 cm longer than the Peugeot 206, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Fabia is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 210 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1016 litres | 992 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Skoda Fabia has 50 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 206. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 24 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.6 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Skoda Fabia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`625 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 206, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |