Skoda Fabia 2000 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001

 
Skoda Fabia
2000 - 2004
Volkswagen Polo
2001 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 64 HP75 HP
Torque: 125 NM195 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 17.9 seconds13.6 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Fabia engine produces 11 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.84.5
Real fuel consumption: 4.9 l/100km5.2 l/100km
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 45 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 930 km in combined cycle1000 km in combined cycle
1120 km on highway1120 km on highway
910 km with real consumption860 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.96 m3.90 m
Width: 1.65 m1.65 m
Height: 1.45 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Fabia is 6 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Fabia is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 260 litres245 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1015 litres975 litres
Skoda Fabia has 15 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 40 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6101`550
Safety:
Quality:
average

below average
Skoda Fabia has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 10001200
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volkswagen Polo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv