Skoda Fabia 2000 vs Rover 25 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 113 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.9 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Rover 25 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 49 HP less power than Rover 25, whereas torque is 115 NM less than Rover 25. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 7.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.2 | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Fabia consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 25, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Fabia is 3 cm shorter than the Rover 25, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1015 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.5 metres more than that of the Rover 25, which means Skoda Fabia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`610 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Rover 25 has
| |