Skoda Fabia 2000 vs Ford Fusion 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 64 HP | 68 HP | |
Torque: | 125 NM | 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.9 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
Ford Fusion is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 4 HP less power than Ford Fusion, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Ford Fusion. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 4.9 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fusion, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fusion. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
1120 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
910 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.96 m | 4.02 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.53 m | |
Skoda Fabia is smaller. Skoda Fabia is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Fusion, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 337 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1015 litres | 1175 litres | |
Ford Fusion has more luggage space. Skoda Fabia has 77 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fusion. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Fusion (by 160 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Fusion, which means Skoda Fabia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`610 | 1`640 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | high | |
Ford Fusion has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Ford Fusion, so Ford Fusion quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Ford Fusion has
| |