Skoda Fabia 2003 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 195 NM | 195 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
Skoda Fabia and Volkswagen Polo have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.5 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
1120 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
910 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.96 m | 3.90 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Fabia is 6 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Fabia is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 245 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1015 litres | 975 litres | |
Skoda Fabia has 15 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 40 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`645 | 1`550 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
| |