Skoda Fabia 2000 vs Rover 25 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 126 NM | 123 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Rover 25 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 3 HP less power than Rover 25, but torque is 3 NM more than Rover 25. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Rover 25 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Fabia is 3 cm shorter than the Rover 25, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 304 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1015 litres | 1086 litres | |
|
Rover 25 has more luggage space. Skoda Fabia has 44 litres less trunk space than the Rover 25. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 25 (by 71 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.5 metres more than that of the Rover 25, which means Skoda Fabia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`570 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Rover 25 has
| |