Skoda Fabia 2000 vs Mitsubishi Colt 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 126 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia engine produces 25 HP more power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 18 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.36 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 8 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1015 litres | 830 litres | |
| Skoda Fabia has 20 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 185 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Skoda Fabia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`570 | 1`445 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |