Skoda Fabia 2000 vs Alfa Romeo 145 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 126 NM | 144 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 145 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 20 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 145, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Alfa Romeo 145. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 145, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 145. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Fabia is 10 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 145, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1015 litres | 1130 litres | |
|
Alfa Romeo 145 has more luggage space. Skoda Fabia has 60 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 145. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Alfa Romeo 145 (by 115 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`570 | 1`685 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 145 has serious deffects in 185 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Alfa Romeo 145 has
| |