Skoda Fabia 2000 vs Peugeot 206 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.5 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 206 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 15 HP less power than Peugeot 206, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Peugeot 206. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.43 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 14 cm longer than the Peugeot 206, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Fabia is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 210 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1016 litres | 992 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Skoda Fabia has 50 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 206. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 24 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.6 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Skoda Fabia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`580 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |