Skoda Fabia 2002 vs Volkswagen Polo 2002

 
Skoda Fabia
2002 - 2004
Volkswagen Polo
2002 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 54 HP55 HP
Torque: 106 NM106 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 18.4 seconds17.5 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Fabia engine produces 1 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.95.9
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
930 km on highway930 km on highway
670 km with real consumption670 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.96 m3.90 m
Width: 1.65 m1.65 m
Height: 1.45 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Fabia is 6 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Fabia is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 260 litres270 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1015 litres1030 litres
Despite its longer length, Skoda Fabia has 10 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. This could mean that the Skoda Fabia uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 15 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5701`530
Safety:
Quality:
average

below average
Skoda Fabia has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 10001600
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv