Skoda Fabia 2000 vs Volkswagen Polo 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 HP | 55 HP | |
| Torque: | 84 NM | 106 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 20.9 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 5 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 500 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Fabia is 6 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Fabia is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1015 litres | 1030 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Skoda Fabia has 10 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. This could mean that the Skoda Fabia uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 15 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`505 | 1`530 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably slightly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |