Skoda Fabia 2000 vs Peugeot 206 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 84 NM | 94 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 20.9 seconds | 15.4 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 206 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 10 HP less power than Peugeot 206, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Peugeot 206. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 500 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.43 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 14 cm longer than the Peugeot 206, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Fabia is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 210 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1015 litres | 992 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Skoda Fabia has 50 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 206. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 23 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.6 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Skoda Fabia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`505 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Peugeot 206 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Peugeot 206, so Peugeot 206 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |