Skoda Fabia 2004 vs Nissan Almera 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 136 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia engine produces 17 HP more power than Nissan Almera, whereas torque is 34 NM more than Nissan Almera. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Almera is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Almera gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Fabia is 22 cm shorter than the Nissan Almera, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 438 litres | 393 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
789 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Nissan Almera may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Almera. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`655 kg | 1`690 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`140 kg | 1`105 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 515 kg | 585 kg | |
| Skoda Fabia load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem less than Nissan Almera. Therefore, Nissan Almera is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Nissan Almera has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Nissan Almera, so Nissan Almera quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 9.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |