Skoda Fabia 2004 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 131 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia engine produces 21 HP more power than Chevrolet Aveo, whereas torque is 39 NM more than Chevrolet Aveo. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Aveo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.31 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller. Skoda Fabia is 9 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Aveo, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 438 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
789 litres | 400 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Fabia has 63 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. The Chevrolet Aveo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 389 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.5 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Aveo, which means Skoda Fabia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`655 | 1`535 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Chevrolet Aveo, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 7.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |