Skoda Fabia 2001 vs Citroen C2 2004
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 143 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Citroen C2 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 10 HP less power than Citroen C2, but torque is 27 NM more than Citroen C2. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 3.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 55 cm longer than the Citroen C2, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 438 litres | 166 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
789 litres | 879 litres | |
| Skoda Fabia has 272 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C2 (by 90 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.2 metres less than that of the Citroen C2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`655 | 1`415 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C2 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Citroen C2 has
| |