Skoda Fabia 2003 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001

 
Skoda Fabia
2003 - 2004
Volkswagen Polo
2001 - 2005
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 75 HP75 HP
Torque: 126 NM126 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.1 seconds12.9 seconds
Skoda Fabia and Volkswagen Polo have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.46.4
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
860 km on highway860 km on highway
660 km with real consumption640 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 370'000 km370'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 4 years4 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m3.90 m
Width: 1.65 m1.65 m
Height: 1.45 m1.46 m
Skoda Fabia is 32 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Fabia is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 438 litres245 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
789 litres975 litres
Skoda Fabia has 193 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 186 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6401`490
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

below average
Skoda Fabia has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 14001400
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Volkswagen Polo has
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv