Skoda Fabia 2003 vs Renault Modus 2004
| Body: | Sedan | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 126 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Renault Modus is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 23 HP less power than Renault Modus, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Renault Modus. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Modus, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Modus. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 49 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Audi A2 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Skoda Fabia 2003 1.4 engine: Engine is known for its simplicity, compact design, and overall reliability. Many complaints from owners are related to power loss or fluctuating idle, often caused by issues with the throttle body, EGR valve, or air leaks ... More about Skoda Fabia 2003 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 3.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.59 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 43 cm longer than the Renault Modus, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 438 litres | 274 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
789 litres | 1283 litres | |
| Skoda Fabia has 164 litres more trunk space than the Renault Modus. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Modus (by 494 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Modus, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Modus has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Renault Modus has
| |