Skoda Fabia 2001 vs Nissan Almera 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 126 NM | 128 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia engine produces 10 HP more power than Nissan Almera, but torque is 2 NM less than Nissan Almera. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Almera gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Fabia is 20 cm shorter than the Nissan Almera, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 438 litres | 393 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
789 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Nissan Almera may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Almera. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`610 kg | 1`690 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`100 kg | 1`105 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 510 kg | 585 kg | |
| Skoda Fabia load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem less than Nissan Almera. Therefore, Nissan Almera is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Nissan Almera has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Nissan Almera, so Nissan Almera quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |