Skoda Fabia 2001 vs Alfa Romeo 156 1997

 
Skoda Fabia
2001 - 2004
Alfa Romeo 156
1997 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 100 HP155 HP
Torque: 126 NM187 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.6 seconds8.6 seconds
Alfa Romeo 156 is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Fabia engine produces 55 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 156, whereas torque is 61 NM less than Alfa Romeo 156. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.78.5
Real fuel consumption: 6.8 l/100km9.2 l/100km
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
830 km on highway950 km on highway
660 km with real consumption680 km with real consumption
Alfa Romeo 156 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.43 m
Width: 1.65 m1.74 m
Height: 1.45 m1.42 m
Skoda Fabia is smaller, but slightly higher.
Skoda Fabia is 21 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 156, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 438 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
789 litresno data
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Fabia has 58 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 156. The Alfa Romeo 156 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.6 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 156, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6101`770
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

low
Skoda Fabia has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 156 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 14001000
Rating in user reviews: 8.8/10 6.7/10
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Alfa Romeo 156 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv