Skoda Fabia 2001 vs Volkswagen Bora 1998

 
Skoda Fabia
2001 - 2004
Volkswagen Bora
1998 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 100 HP101 HP
Torque: 126 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.6 seconds12 seconds
Skoda Fabia engine produces 1 HP less power than Volkswagen Bora, whereas torque is 19 NM less than Volkswagen Bora. Despite less power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.77.5
Real fuel consumption: 6.8 l/100km8.1 l/100km
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Bora, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Bora.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle730 km in combined cycle
830 km on highway940 km on highway
660 km with real consumption670 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Bora gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.38 m
Width: 1.65 m1.74 m
Height: 1.45 m1.45 m
Skoda Fabia is smaller.
Skoda Fabia is 16 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Bora, 9 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 438 litres455 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
789 litres785 litres
Skoda Fabia has 17 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Bora. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 4 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Bora, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6101`720
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 12001400
Rating in user reviews: 8.8/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Volkswagen Bora has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv