Skoda Fabia 2001 vs Seat Cordoba 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 HP | 100 HP | |
Torque: | 126 NM | 126 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
Skoda Fabia and Seat Cordoba have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Fabia consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
830 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
660 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.22 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
Skoda Fabia is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Fabia is 6 cm shorter than the Seat Cordoba, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 438 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
789 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.1 metres less than that of the Seat Cordoba. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`610 | 1`000 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Seat Cordoba has
| |