Skoda Fabia 2001 vs Skoda Roomster 2006
| Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 126 NM | 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.3 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Skoda Roomster is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 11 HP less power than Skoda Roomster, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Skoda Roomster. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Roomster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Roomster gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Skoda Fabia 2001 1.4 engine: Engine is known for its simplicity, compact design, and overall reliability. Many complaints from owners are related to power loss or fluctuating idle, often caused by issues with the throttle body, EGR valve, or air leaks ... More about Skoda Fabia 2001 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.61 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 2 cm longer than the Skoda Roomster, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 438 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
789 litres | 1780 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Skoda Fabia has 12 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Roomster. This could mean that the Skoda Fabia uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Roomster (by 991 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`670 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Skoda Roomster has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 170 percent more cases than Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Roomster quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Skoda Roomster has
| |